Divided, We Rule?
One of the penalties
for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by
your inferiors. - Plato
Democracy
is more than a form of Government. It is a s pecial condition of society. It
seeks to preserve the dignity of man and to build itself on it. It represents a
state of society in which the rights of people are equal, and their thoughts
and sentiments are similar. It exists where rival claims of individual and
society are equitably adjusted, where every citizen is free and has a right to
order its life to his best advantage, where, the opportunities for all are
equal, where the citizens choose their government by the exercise of free
votes, and also control its policy by their opinions freely exercised, where
dignity of man and rule of law are to be found.
Is
this what we see in India today? Is this ideology reflected in the politics
that permeates throughout the nation?
“For all the flaws and vices of many of
contemporary India's regional political figures, the regionalisation of India's
politics is a democratic outcome that has emerged through the dynamic evolution
of India's democracy over six decades," says London School of Economics
(LSE) professor, Sumantra Bose.
According
to me, the face of democracy has undergone a not-so-desirable change because of
the upsurge of regional political parties. The regionalisation of India's
political landscape has decentralised power and has deepened the cracks of the country's
democracy. The local parties which are part of the coalition government at the
centre use their power to stall the development activities of the Centre that
are genuinely intended for the growth of the country. For instance, TMC’s
opposition to FDI in retail, aviation and insurance sector. The local parties
for their political benefits divide the people of different states on the lines
of language, culture and tradition. This affects the overall unity and
integrity of the country. It affects India’s credibility in the global front
and portrays India as unreliable in terms of sticking to its long-held
policies. For example, by voting against Sri Lanka in UN resolution on war
crimes against Tamils owing to pressure from DMK, India broke away from a long
held tradition of not voting for country-specific resolutions. This has
significantly affected Indo-Srilanka relations.
Disputes
between the states that are ruled by the local parties becomes difficult to
settle since they raise the dispute from administrative and governance level to
political and personal level by exploiting the sentiments of the people of the
individual states. This often culminates in violence through strikes, bandhs
and in the worst case, attack on the other state people. For
instance, Cauvery dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu; Maharashtra
political group’s intolerance towards people from other states. The state
governments that get more funds can use these funds for subsidising more and
more basic necessities thereby making the people lethargic and killing the
motivation to work hard. Subsidising the scant resources in particular state
can impact the prices in other states.
A
particularly ripe outcome of the emergence of regional parties is the demand
for bifurcation of states. For example, Telangana and Gorkhaland. Politicians
have lost the sense of the bigger picture and have devoted all their energies
to demand a separate land for their ‘own’ people. The case of the upcoming 29th
state, Telangana, is very different from Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh or
Uttarakhand. Its birth would eclipse the parent state itself, reducing it to
nothing but a small block (Rayalaseema) and a coastal strip (Coastal Andhra) on
the map of the country.
The
Centre too has taken the stance of appeasement. They do not want to rub any of
the regional parties the wrong way, so that they can secure an electorate in
their territory. It is slowly and steadily turning into a business with stress
on profit and loss. For the Congress, Telangana was their trump card. Telangana
has 17 Lok Sabha seats and 119 Assembly seats (AP has a total of 294 Assembly
seats). If there is a Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS)-Congress
coalition/merger, it can aspire to the magic figure of 60 Assembly seats and
12-14 LS seats here. It is believed that since the national parties have failed
to represent the particular needs and aspirations of the people of the region,
regional political parties have been formed with ethnic considerations. Ethnic
dimension, therefore, has been one of the most important components of
regionalism in India.
During
last two decades, the rise of regional parties has influenced not only state
politics; but also the national parties and national politics. With sizeable
electoral support, the regional parties have not only managed to win elections
and form state governments, they have also influenced the national politics.
Thus
one can safely conclude that regional politics have led to fractured mandates
which undoubtedly are the future of Indian democracy.
Sramana Chakraborty
M.sc Media, P.G 1
_________________________________________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment